Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 5, 2020No. 115817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,817 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AARON ROBERT BROWN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An ambiguous verdict can be reasonably interpreted in light of the charging document, the jury instructions, and the record as a whole to determine and give effect to the jury's intent. 2. When such intent is clear, a mistaken description of the crime of conviction contained in the verdict form may be discarded as surplusage when the verdict form also refers to the correct charge by pointing back to the charging document or the jury instructions. 3.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Statler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. WhitingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API