Legal Opinion
State v. Rouse
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1988No. 87AP-993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHendrickson, J.
Appellant, Ted A. Rouse, appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle with a concentration of one-tenth gram or more per two hundred ten liters of breath, R.C. 4511.19(A)(3), entered by the Franklin County Municipal Court. Appellant raises two assignments of error, the first with three subparts, as follows:
“1. The trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence in that the defendant’s arrest was unconstitutional and unlawful.
“A. A police officer may not break into a private residence without a warrant in order to issue a minor misdemeanor speed citation.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. KarleOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Elyria v. TressOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. Damron, 08ap-110 (11-20-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.