City of Elyria v. Tress
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentReece, Judge
I dissent from the holding of the majority. As an initial note, I can find no evidence in the record that the propriety of Tress’s arrest was ever questioned in the common pleas court. If a lawful arrest is a necessary element of resisting under R.C. 2921.33(A) and Tress felt insufficient evidence was presented on this issue, he should have addressed this contention in his motion for a judgment of acquittal. Crim.R. 29. Having failed to do so, this court should decline to review the matter for the first time on appeal. State v. Roe (1989), 41 Ohio St.3d 18, 25, 535 N.E.2d 1351, 1360; Akron v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. John Henry MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.