Legal Opinion
Jerome B. Rosenthal, Esq. v. Joseph L. Carr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1980No. 76-1917PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Jerome Rosenthal appeals the dismissal of his suit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to enjoin Joseph Carr, the Trial Examiner for the California State Bar, from proceeding with a disciplinary action filed against Rosenthal until the State Bar appoints counsel to represent him. We affirm. 1
Appellant Rosenthal is a California attorney against whom disciplinary proceedings are pending before the State Bar. Formal hearings were scheduled to commence, and did commence, on March 17,1976. Appellee Carr is acting as the State Bar’s “Trial Examiner” for the purpose of prosecuting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trainor v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martin Erdmann v. Harold A. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert Michenfelder v. George Sumner Lieutenant Koon C/o Horn C/o Leslie Sgt Jenae Holmes Sgt Stuffelbeam James ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-MassengaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- World Famous Drinking Emporium, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Peter L. Flangas v. State Bar of Nevada, John C. Mowbray, Gordon Thompson, Cameron M. Batjer and Noel ManoukianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Miofsky v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.