Legal Opinion

Topton National Bank v. Holland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1959No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

These facts are not in dispute: Warren Holland leased a Gallion Boiler and an Allis Chalmers Grader from Clayton P. Fehr and Boy S. Hahn for a total rental of $5,100; he paid $2,350 in rentals leaving a balance due of $2,750. Fehr and Hahn then repossessed the leased equipment; whereupon Holland brought an action of replevin against them which came on for trial before the late Judge Frack and a jury in May 1955. Holland had retained attorneys Francis H. S. Ede and.Baymond DeBaymond to represent him in the action. Fehr and Hahn gave a bond and retained possession of the road…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanover Construction Co. v. FehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Diggs v. Taylor and Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Gleckel EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Almi, Inc. v. Dick Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Carmichael v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. PBS Coals, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Miernicki v. SeltzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API