Legal Opinion

Hanover Construction Co. v. Fehr

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 40 and 51PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

These two appeals challenge the propriety of the ruling of the court below in a replevin action, after a *200jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor, granting a new trial to defendants and refusing judgment n.o.v. in favor of defendants.

In August 1953 Warren Holland, doing business as Hanover Construction Company, orally agreed to purchase from Clayton Fehr and Roy Hahn a Galion roller and an Allis Chalmers grader for the sum of $5,100. On August 12, 1953 Holland (plaintiff)1 and Felir and Hahn (defendants) entered into a written bailment lease under the terms of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Priester v. MillemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Cole v. Philadelphia CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Batchelder v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Sheesley v. Bisbee Linseed Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Ziegenfuss v. Ziegenfuss Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Linda Coal & Supply Co. v. Tasa Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Cowen v. KRASASSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. State v. BishopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Topton National Bank v. HollandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API