Legal Opinion

Becker v. Baron Bros.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1994PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

On the strength of Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 90 N.J. 191, 447 A.2d 539 (1982), the Appellate Division ruled that all asbestos products marketed without warnings are defective as a matter of law. It therefore affirmed the judgment of the Law Division, entered on a verdict by a jury that had been instructed that that was the law.

We granted the petitions for certification of defendant General Motors Corp., 134 N.J. 476, 634 A.2d 524 (1993), and of defendant Englewood Brake Company, Inc., — N.J. -,— A.2d(1994), and now reverse.

I

A…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Myrlak v. Port Auth. of NY and NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. James v. Bessemer Processing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API