Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are raised on this appeal:(1) Did the defendant waive counsel and enter a plea of guilty to the charge freely, voluntarily, and understandingly?(2) Did the information filed charge an offense within the meaning of sec. 948.88 (2), Stats. ?

The question of the withdrawal of the plea of guilty is generally addressed to the discretion of the trial court.1

In Van Voorhis v. State (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 217, 223, 131 N. W. (2d) 833, this court said:

“Although an application for leave to withdraw a plea is ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the court such withdrawal would be a matter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Burnett v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Van Voorhis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. PayneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Kline v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Creighbaum v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API