Desibia v. Monongahela Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 18, Jan. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Fayette Co., Dec. T., 1914, No. 199, refusing to take off compulsory non-suit, in case of Dominick Desibia v. The Monongahela Railway Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 18, Jan. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Fayette Co., Dec. T., 1914, No. 199, refusing to take off compulsory non-suit, in case of Dominick Desibia v. The Monongahela Railway Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion of Van Swearingen, P. J., sur defendant’s motion to take off nonsuit: At the trial of this case a compulsory nonsuit was entered on the ground that no negligence on the part of the defendant had been shown, and the case is before' the court now on a motion to strike off the nonsuit. At the time…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below refusing to take off the nonsuit.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Patton v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (Duquesne Slag Products Co., Third Party Defendant) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Lentz v. Allentown Bobbin WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Semensky v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.