Cash v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a plea of guilty, movant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. His motion under Rule 24.035 seeking to vacate that conviction was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Movant appeals, presenting two points relied on. Appellate review is to determine whether the findings and conclusions of the trial court are clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j).
Movant contends in his first point that the trial court erred in failing to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues raised by movant’s postconviction relief “motions”. Movant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Boggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Batson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Huffman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wesson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. VincentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Brownlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Neal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990