Legal Opinion

Cash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1989No. 16187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a plea of guilty, movant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. His motion under Rule 24.035 seeking to vacate that conviction was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Movant appeals, presenting two points relied on. Appellate review is to determine whether the findings and conclusions of the trial court are clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j).

Movant contends in his first point that the trial court erred in failing to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues raised by movant’s postconviction relief “motions”. Movant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Boggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Batson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Huffman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Wesson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. VincentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Brownlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Neal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API