Gray v. Small
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs’ sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Summary judgment is proper when the pleadings, depositions and admissions on file, together with any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Johnson v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co., 300 N.C. 247, 266 S.E.2d 610 (1980). N.C. R. Civ. P. 56. In determining whether summary judgment is proper, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Pafford v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- DeHaven v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Freeman v. STURDIVANT DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- D'ALESSANDRO v. WestallDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Gray v. SmallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Luck v. GSSW Limited PartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.