Hamburger v. Economy Department Store
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, P. J.
On the 8th of February, 1923,, defendant, a merchant of Sioux Falls, ordered 669 pairs of shoes of plaintiff, a wholesale merchant of Boston. The shoes were ordered and billed at specified prices per pair. On receipt of the shipment, defendant returned 72 pairs and received credit at invoiced price on his account for the shoes returned. A little more than a month later, after repeated demands for payment, defendant returned 258 pairs more, claiming that they did not conform- to sample, and notified plaintiff of the return shipment stating, “remittance for balance of account will follow in a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgan v. Hannah's LesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
- Qualseth v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Adams v. MoreheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Hagen v. Townsend & WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Eggland v. SouthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eberle v. McKeownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Reliance Varnish Co. v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Drier v. Great American Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Hubbard Milling Co. v. FrameSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Drier v. Great American Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987