Legal Opinion

Hagen v. Townsend & White

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit -Court, Beadle County. Hon. Arva E. Tayi.or, Judge. Action by O. S-. Hagen against Townsend & White, co-partners. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

Appellant sued to recover the balance claimed to be due for certain wheat sold respondents. The complaint alleged the sale of 4231^ bushels at 91 cents per bushel, or a total of $385.38 worth, and admits the receipt in part payment of a check for $360.20, claiming an unpaid balance of $25.18. The amended answer admits the purchase of wheat, but sets forth that there were but 409 bushels, and that the purchase price thereof was 88 cents per bushel, or a total of $360.20, which had been paid in full. Verdict and judgment were for the defendants. A new trial was denied, and an appeal taken from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walston v. F. D. Calkins Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Jones v. MatthiesonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Qualseth v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Adams v. MoreheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hamburger v. Economy Department StoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Siegele v. Des Moines Mut. Hail Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hamburger v. Economy Department StoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API