Legal Opinion
People v. Gulley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 24, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*980The County Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly determined that the assessment of 15 points under risk factor 11 (Drug or Alcohol Abuse-History of Abuse) of the risk assessment instrument was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders and the defendant’s own testimony at the risk level assessment hearing established that the defendant had a history of alcohol and drug abuse (see People v Crandall, 90 AD3d 628, 629 [2011]; People v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GeehrengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GeehrengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012