Legal Opinion

McAllister v. State ex rel. Heath

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 9648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellant filed a motion to quash an ^execution issued against him and one Edward McAllister.

Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal, and the questions presented by this motion first require consideration. The ground upon which it is rested is, that Edward McAllister is not made an appellee, and was not notified of the appeal. It was not necessary that he should have been made a party to the appeal. The motion was by the appellant alone; the judgment pronounced upon it was against him solely, and Edward McAllister was in no wise affected by the motion or judgment.

Answers to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stone v. State ex rel. BurdsallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Sterne v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Skelton v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hawes v. PritchardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ensley v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BohannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Cochran v. HopewellNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. HogeboomNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API