Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gowdy v. Tahash

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1969No. 41439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from an order of the district court discharging a writ of habeas corpus issued subsequent to relator’s conviction for the crime of first-degree murder. The issue in the habeas corpus proceeding was whether relator was competent to have stood trial for that crime.* 1 The issue on appeal is whether there is evidentiary support for the district court’s findings that relator was competent to stand trial and that he was adequately represented by counsel at trial. We hold that there was such evidentiary support and that relator failed to sustain his burden of proof.

The evidence presented in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GowdySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Auraria Businessmen Against Confiscation, Inc. v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Payne v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Lusk v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Payne v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API