Legal Opinion

Payne v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1987No. C2-86-1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

The State appeals from an order stemming from a habeas corpus petition in which the trial court found that the State had not proven that weekly reviews of an inmate placed in administrative segregation were conducted. We reverse.

FACTS

On February 19, 1986 Gregory Payne was placed in the administrative segregation unit at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Stillwater (MCF-STW). He was placed there pending an investigation into *127whether Payne was involved in a swindling scheme. The investigation looked into allegations that Payne and another inmate began a fundraising…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. May v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Tureson v. TuresonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Payne v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API