Legal Opinion
Payne v. Erickson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1987No. C2-86-1907Published
1Opinion of the Court
399 N.W.2d 126 (1987)
Gregory M. PAYNE, Petitioner, Respondent,
v.
Robert A. ERICKSON, etc., et al., Appellants.
No. C2-86-1907.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
January 13, 1987.
Review Granted March 18, 1987.
Gregory M. Payne, Pro Se.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Richard L. Varco, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for appellants.
Heard, considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., FOLEY and WOZNIAK, JJ.
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
The State appeals from an order stemming from a habeas corpus petition in which the trial court found that the State had not proven that weekly reviews of an inmate placed in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State Ex Rel. May v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Tureson v. TuresonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.