Legal Opinion

Engineered Arresting Systems Corp. v. M/V Saudi Hofuf

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 5, 2014No. 12 Civ. 6420(AT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

In this admiralty and maritime action, Defendant, National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia (“NSCSA”) seeks partial summary judgment holding that its potential liability to Plaintiff, Engineered Arresting Systems Corporation (“EAS”), is limited to $8,000, For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

*304BACKGROUND

This action arises out of damage to a shipment of six trailers containing Portar-rest P-IV Mobile Aircraft Arresting Systems (the “Shipment”),1 which were sold by EAS to the Indian government and transported by NSCSA, EAS…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Amaker v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marquette Transportation Company, LLC v. Emerald International CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
  2. Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos Sanchez S De R L De C.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API