Legal Opinion
Hexcel Corp. v. Advanced Textiles, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided July 24, 1989No. Civ. A. A-88-CA-641PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALTER S. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.
Came on to be considered Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and For Failure to State a Claim. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Plaintiffs motion is meritorious and should be granted.
Plaintiff Hexcel Corporation (“Hexcel”) brought this suit against Defendants Advanced Textiles (“Advanced Textiles”) and H. Keith Hutson (“Hutson”) alleging patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. This Court has jurisdiction over this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Sections 1338(a) and 1338(b).
The following facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Diamond Scientific Co. v. Ambico, Inc. And Clarence Joseph WelterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Nationwide Chemical Corporation, a Corporation v. Wilburn T. Wright, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- American Fence Co., Inc. v. MRM SEC. Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Nationwide Chemical Corp. v. WrightDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., HCM Division v. Truseal USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1991
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Extrusion Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- VRG Controls, LLC v. Valpres SRLDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019