Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wells

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1991No. 2390PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case we are called upon to determine whether the trial court improperly excluded rebuttal evidence offered to impeach a key prosecution witness, and whether counsel’s self-confessed lack of preparation denied appellant a fair trial. We find no merit in either contention and affirm.

On Saturday evening at approximately 8:30 p.m. on December 6, 1980, appellant forced his way into the apartment of Mrs. Laurenstine Johnson of Philadelphia and proceeded to rob the occupants at gun point. Appellant was extremely agitated during the course of the robbery and pistol-whipped both…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. HentoshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. FerrariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. ShoupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API