Legal Opinion
KAZMER-STANDISH, ETC. v. Schoeffel Instrument
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 19, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
177 N.J. Super. 412 (1981)
426 A.2d 1061
KAZMER-STANDISH CONSULTANTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SCHOEFFEL INSTRUMENT CORP. AND KRATOS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 13, 1981.
Decided February 19, 1981.
Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.
Dennis W. Blake argued the cause for appellant (Friedland & Rudolph, attorneys).
Michael S. Meisel argued the cause for respondents (Cole, Berman & Belsky, attorneys; Michael S. Meisel and Gerald H. Gline on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.
Plaintiff Kazmer-Standish…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lurie v. Republican AllianceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Kenney v. Paterson Milk & Cream Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Tanenbaum v. Sylvan Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kazmer-Standish Consultants, Inc. v. Schoeffel Instruments Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill, Appellees-Cross v. Donald W. Ritter, Appellant-Cross v. Ritter Transportation, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill, Appellees-Cross v. Donald W. Ritter, Appellant-Cross v. Ritter Transportation, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991