Legal Opinion
Kazmer-Standish Consultants, Inc. v. Schoeffel Instruments Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 2, 1982PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
The issue in these cases is whether a broker who does not have a license to sell real estate may recover any commission from the sale of an ongoing business that includes an interest in real estate. In Kazmer-Standish Consultants, Inc. v. Schoeffel Instrument Corp., 177 N.J.Super. 412 (1981), certif. granted, 87 N.J. 361 (1981), one part of the Appellate Division affirmed the summary judgment denying the broker a commission. In an unreported decision in Stender v. Perma-Clad Industries, Inc., another part of the Appellate Division affirmed a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Kenney v. Paterson Milk & Cream Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Corson v. KeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Burke v. IsraelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Solomon v. GoldbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Irving B. Gruber v. Owens-Illinois Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Roberts v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Business Brokerage Centre v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.