Legal Opinion

People v. Booker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order appealed from should be affirmed. Our examination of the record shows that defendant’s motion to suppress the gun was not premised upon the failure to provide warnings in accordance with the mandate of Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436). This argument is not one which constitutes a question of law reviewable in this court despite the failure to timely raise the issue (compare People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011, with People v Michael, 48 NY2d 1). Hence, defendant’s failure to preserve this issue for review precludes his reliance upon it upon this appeal and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. People v. BigusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. MunroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API