Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Estate of Rayma Percell (Lohman v. Headley)

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 6, 2012No. 20110651-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

T1 Galen Headley appeals from the district court's Order on Motion for Delivery of Property wherein the court determined ownership of property and ordered Headley to transfer certain pieces of property to Diana Lynn Lohman, the personal representative of the estate of Rayma Lynnette Percell. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 Headley and Percell began dating in 1991. Headley moved into Percell's home with her in 1992, which home she later conveyed into joint tenancy with Headley. Headley and Percell owned two other properties jointly. Percell solely owned an RV park called the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Dahl v. PrinceUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lake Philgas Service v. Valley Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. Johnston v. SimpsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. VisserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SparlingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  2. Rupp v. Posso (In re Castillo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API