Legal Opinion

State v. Visser

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 6, 2001No. 971760-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge:

T1 We decide this case on remand from the Utah Supreme Court. Defendant contends he was incompetent to enter a guilty plea, received ineffective assistance of counsel, and was deprived of his right to due process at the taking of his guilty plea. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

1 2 The more detailed facts are set forth in State v. Visser, 1999 UT App 019, 973 P.2d 998 (Visser I), and State v. Visser, 2000 UT 88, 408 Utah Adv. Rep. 9, 22 P.3d 1242 (Visser II). We reiterate only the facts relevant to the issues addressed in this appeal.

13 On October 16, 1996, the State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greene v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. KooymanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  3. State v. KingstonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  4. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. In the Matter of the Estate of Rayma Percell (Lohman v. Headley)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API