Legal Opinion
Sandow v. Eckstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 11, 2001No. AC 21153PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiffs, Joan Sandow and William Sandow,1 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, Maiy Ann Eckstein and Production Typographers, Inc., following a jury trial. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly charged the jury. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. At approximately 7:30 p.m. on Friday, February 3, 1995, the named plaintiff was traveling northbound on Woodbine Road in Stamford. Woodbine Road is a narrow, winding, unlit road without sidewalks or shoulders.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Stone v. BastaracheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Royal Homes, Inc. v. Dalene Hardwood Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Colucci v. PinetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Caschetto v. Silliman Godfrey Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. KellerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Morales v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Olynciw v. Stop & Shop CompaniesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.