Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 8, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0443-RPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPENCER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Snap-on Tools Corporation’s (“Snap-on”) motion for summary judgment. In his amended complaint, Robert L. Sullivan (“Sullivan”) seeks damages for the alleged breach of his employment contract. The dispositive issue presented is whether Sullivan’s employment contract with Snap-on contained a just cause provision which removed him from an employment at will status. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that Sullivan was merely an at will employee. Snap-on’s motion for summary judgment will therefore be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miller v. Sevamp, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. David K. Pratt and Teri D. Pratt v. Brown MacHine Company, a Division of John Brown, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  5. Haigh v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hung P. Nguyen v. Cna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. DwigginsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  4. Pat Choate v. Trw, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Michael v. Sentara Health SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API