Legal Opinion

Vought Industries, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 1994-0175Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 261.] VOUGHT INDUSTRIES, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. [Cite as Vought Industries, Inc. v. Tracy,

1995-Ohio-18.] Taxation—Franchise tax—R.C. 5733.06(E) does not apply to a corporation in reorganization under Section 1102, Title 11, U.S. Code. __________________ A corporation in reorganization under Section 1102, Title 11, U.S. Code is not equivalent to a corporation which has been adjudicated bankrupt or for which a receiver has been appointed; therefore, R.C. 5733.06(E), the exemption from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ares, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vought Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Zalud Oldsmobile, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API