Vought Industries, Inc. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 261.] VOUGHT INDUSTRIES, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. [Cite as Vought Industries, Inc. v. Tracy,
1995-Ohio-18.] Taxation—Franchise tax—R.C. 5733.06(E) does not apply to a corporation in reorganization under Section 1102, Title 11, U.S. Code. __________________ A corporation in reorganization under Section 1102, Title 11, U.S. Code is not equivalent to a corporation which has been adjudicated bankrupt or for which a receiver has been appointed; therefore, R.C. 5733.06(E), the exemption from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ares, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Vought Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Zalud Oldsmobile, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.