Legal Opinion

Zalud Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1994No. 92-2379PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Zalud maintains that motor vehicles that are individually registered in the name of a dealer and operated on public streets by its employees are not defined as “personal property” under R.C. 5701.03, and that it need not include them in calculating its inventory’s average monthly value. The Tax Commissioner, to the contrary, contends that R.C. 4501.01(V) defines Zalud to be a “dealer” and not an “owner” of the automobile and that R.C. 5701.03 defines the vehicles as “personal property.” We agree with Zalud and reverse the BTA’s decision.

R.C. 5711.15 requires a merchant to estimate the value…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marc Lance Ford, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. City of Maumee v. PrebegMaumee Municipal Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. Vought Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lakefront Lines, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Tri County Wholesale Distributors, Inc. v. Labatt USA Operating Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API