Legal Opinion

Naffah v. Diebold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1944No. Appeal, 113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, Latoof Naffah, was the owner of certain land in Pittsburgh upon which he undertook the construction of an apartment building. He borrowed considerable sums of money from a bank, the loans being secured by mortgages on this and other properties, but as he lacked resources to finance the building to its completion and became largely indebted to contractors and subcontractors he and his wife conveyed the property, under and subject to the mortgage liens thereon, to a committee of his creditors, the present defendants. The project did not work out and several years later the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ebbert v. Plymouth Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. May's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Moore's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Burke v. GummeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  5. Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Leseman-Frederick Co. v. DieboldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Coleman v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API