Legal Opinion

Naffah v. City Deposit Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1941No. Appeal, 195PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

It is unnecessary to recite in detail the extraordinarily complicated facts of which this litigation is the outgrowth. A brief statement will suffice. Plaintiff was the owner of three adjoining tracts of land in the City of Pittsburgh, the title to which was in his wife’s name. In order to secure loans of considerable sums made to him by the City Deposit Bank, four mortgages of $50,000 each were successively executed and delivered to the bank, all of them becoming liens on one of the tracts (tract “A”), the second, third and fourth mortgages on another tract (tract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Fair Oaks Building & Loan Ass'n v. KahlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Faulkner v. McHenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Moats v. Thompson, Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Moore's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Girard Trust Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Greiner v. Brubaker, Admrx.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Naffah v. DieboldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API