Legal Opinion
State v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 2004No. A03-2050PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant David Brooks challenges his convictions and sentence, arguing that (1) his sentence was invalid because the district court, rather than a jury, found that appellant’s criminal history score included a custody status point; (2) the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions.
FACTS
In May 2001, appellant attacked his girlfriend. He was subsequently charged with and convicted of fifth-degree felony assault. This court affirmed the conviction in State v. Brooks, No. C2-02-1434, 2003 WL 22039323…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MaurstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. Ge HerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.