Legal Opinion

Bechard v. Lake

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 9, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

On plaintiff’s motion for new trial. Plaintiff’s intestate, Eugene E. Bechard, while walking on the highway, was instantly killed as the result of collision with an automobile operated by the defendant. Suit was brought under the death-liability statute. Under R. S., Chap. 96, Sec. 50, the person for whose death action is brought is presumed to have been in the exercise of due care at the time of all acts in any way related to his death, and if contributory negligence be relied upon as a defense, it must be pleaded and proved *387by the defendant. The defendant pleaded such contributory…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Whalen v. MutrieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Fernald v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  3. Matulis v. GansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Schmeiske v. LaubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Field v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Waters v. National Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Sansbury v. GerrishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API