Legal Opinion
Alfred Garionis, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Harriet Newton and Keith Barr, Appellees/cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1987No. 86-2085, 86-2148PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Alfred Garionis sued Ralph Young, Harriet Newton, and Keith Barr under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that they violated his federal constitutional rights. On Garionis’s motion, Young was dismissed before trial, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Newton and Barr. Garionis moved for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but these were denied by the District Court, 1 and judgment was entered on the verdict. Newton moved for an award of attorney’s fees against Garionis, but this was also denied. Garionis appeals from the judgment, while Newton…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Charles Wayne Foster and Dana Gay Foster v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, Officers A. Baetz, Bruce Griller, and J. EdblomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Keene Corp. v. CassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- George R. Arnott, Sr. v. John Mataya, Greg ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- K & S Partnership v. Continental Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. Brenton First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.