Legal Opinion

Keene Corp. v. Cass

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1990No. Nos. 89-5405, 89-5603PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Keene Corporation (Keene) appeals a district court1 judgment dismissing its suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying its motion for a preliminary injunction and appeals a separate judgment granting defendants, other than Judge J.E. Cass, their attorneys fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1988). Keene contends that subject matter jurisdiction is properly grounded under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and that the district court improperly determined that Keene’s lawsuit lacked merit, thus warranting an award of attorneys fees. We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually Lloyd W. Pellman, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Joel Charchenko v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Branson v. NottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. David J. BECHTOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API