Keene Corp. v. Cass
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, Keene Corporation (Keene) appeals a district court1 judgment dismissing its suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying its motion for a preliminary injunction and appeals a separate judgment granting defendants, other than Judge J.E. Cass, their attorneys fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1988). Keene contends that subject matter jurisdiction is properly grounded under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and that the district court improperly determined that Keene’s lawsuit lacked merit, thus warranting an award of attorneys fees. We…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually Lloyd W. Pellman, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Joel Charchenko v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Branson v. NottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- David J. BECHTOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.