Legal Opinion
United States v. Valencia-Barragan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 2010No. 09-50018PublishedCited by 261 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 6, 2010, is amended, and the amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With the filing of the amended opinion, the panel has voted unanimously to deny both petitions for rehearing. Judge Fisher voted to deny the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Goodwin and Canby recommended denial.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing are DENIED and the petition for rehearing en banc is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- United States v. Gonzalez-AparicioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Faustino GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Juan RangelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.