Legal Opinion

Forbush v. NTI-CA Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 19, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00141Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL J. FORBUSH, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-00141-H-RBB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO ALLOW SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT NTI 14 NTI-CA INC., a Nevada corporation, dba THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA NTI GROUND TRANS; JOHN E. 15 SECRETARY OF STATE KINDT, an individual; and DOES 1 16 through 10 inclusive [Doc. No. 28.] 17 Defendants. 18 On May 15, 2024, Plaintiff Michael J. Forbush filed a motion to allow service of 19 process on Defendant NTI-CA, Inc. doing business as NTI Ground…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Noel Mason v. Genisco Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API