Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided December 12, 2007No. 03-06-00205-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.

After an information was filed accusing him of driving while intoxicated, appellee Roy Guzman filed a motion to suppress evidence urging that the traffic stop that resulted in his arrest for this offense was unlawful. The trial court granted the mo*365tion to suppress following a hearing, and this appeal by the State followed. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West 2006). We affirm the court’s order.

We previously sustained the State’s first point of error, by which it complained of the trial court’s refusal to make findings of fact and conclusions of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Foster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  3. Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  4. Cole Shipley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  5. David Sawyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API