Legal Opinion

Guigni v. Ratto

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1919No. Civ. No. 2941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thos. F. Graham, Judge. Appeal dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion, of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal from a judgment entered upon stipulation.

The respondents sued the appellant and fictitious defendants for unlawful detainer. After demurrer, the defendant answered on January 13, 1919. Under date of January 16, 1919, a stipulation, filed February 8, 1919, was made providing that judgment might be entered for the plaintiffs and against the defendants for restitution of the premises, cancellation of lease, and $250 damages. The stipulation further provided execution should be stayed until March 1, 1919. On February 8,1919, judgment was signed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HildebrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Robertson v. MaroevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API