Robertson v. Maroevich
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
On petition of appellant this court issued an order to show cause why a writ of supersedeas should not be granted, with a temporary stay in the meantime. There-after, respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment appealed from had been entered upon consent of appellant. Inasmuch as we are of the opinion that the appeal must be dismissed for the reason that the record shows that the judgment appealed from was entered upon, and with the consent of, appellant, the petition for the writ of supersedeas must be denied.
After judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Luse v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Schrader v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Hawkins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.