Legal Opinion

People v. Finley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 14, 1978No. 77-1266, 77-1267 consPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a jury trial, defendants John Finley and Lawrence Laney were convicted of robbery and were each sentenced to 5 to 15 years. Their separate appeals were consolidated. Separate briefs have been filed for each defendant.

In this court, Laney claims that the State failed to prove him guilty of robbery beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury on the theory of accountability. Defendant Finley contends that he was denied a fair trial when the trial court permitted improper testimony…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. The People v. HairstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. HowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. People v. McCarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. People v. GarzaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. William Johnston v. Larry Mizell, Warden, and Attorney General, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. People v. GornickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API