Legal Opinion

Cooks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 2007No. PD-0010-06PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.

in which MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

A defendant has 30 days to file a motion for new trial after the date that the trial court imposes or suspends sentence in open court. 1 This case presents the question of whether this 30-day period of time is a “critical stage” during which a defendant is constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel in filing a motion for new trial. We decide that this period is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding, but that the deprivation of effective assistance of counsel is subject to an analysis for prejudice…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by179 opinions

  1. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Stokes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API