Legal Opinion

William Johnston v. Larry Mizell, Warden, and Attorney General, State of Illinois

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 31, 1990No. 89-1662PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner-appellant William Johnston filed in the district court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleged that Johnston’s sixth and fourteenth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was infringed when in a post-trial motion and hearing for a new trial Johnston’s trial counsel, Henson, argued that his own assistance at trial was ineffective. After Johnston consented to final judgment by a magistrate, the magistrate denied his petition. Johnston appeals that decision.

Underlying Johnston’s habeas action…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Betty Lou Beets v. Wayne Scott, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto Jose DEL MURO, AKA Raul Torres-Garcia, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Williams v. TurpinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API