Elvington v. Waccamaw Shingle Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Tbe legal basis of plaintiff’s cause of action is wrongful, unlawful and unwarranted interference witb tbe contract of sale made by him witb John J. Knox.
It is a violation of a legal right, recognized by law, to interfere witb contractual relation, if there be no sufficient justification for tbe interference. Pollock on Torts, 12 ed., 332. A clear and comprehensive statement of tbe principle is found in Angle v. Chicago St. P. M. & O. B. Co., 151 U. S., 55, and is in tbis language: “Wherever a man does an act which in law and in fact is a wrongful act, and such act as may, as a natural and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Jones v. . StanlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Famous Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Swain v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Bell v. DanzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Sineath v. . KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Sineath v. KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.