People v. West
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— The defendant was charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder. The jury found the defendant guilty in the following language: “ We, the jury in the above-entitled case, find the defendant guilty.” It is claimed that this verdict is contrary to law; does not find the defendant guilty of any offense; and that because the lesser crime of simple assault is included within the crime charged in the information the verdict is ambiguous and uncertain. The jury were *346given four forms of verdict, the court saying: “ I have prepared forms of verdict for you. You will find that they…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. MccurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Judd v. LettsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.