Legal Opinion

People v. West

California Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1887No. 20317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

— The defendant was charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder. The jury found the defendant guilty in the following language: “ We, the jury in the above-entitled case, find the defendant guilty.” It is claimed that this verdict is contrary to law; does not find the defendant guilty of any offense; and that because the lesser crime of simple assault is included within the crime charged in the information the verdict is ambiguous and uncertain. The jury were *346given four forms of verdict, the court saying: “ I have prepared forms of verdict for you. You will find that they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MccurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Judd v. LettsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API