State of Iowa v. Deantay Darelle Williams
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Chief Justice.
In this case, we consider whether the speedy indictment rule requires the dis*858missal of a trial information against a defendant filed more than forty-five days after the defendant was taken into. custody, interrogated, and released without the filing of a criminal complaint. The district court held the rule did not require the charges to be dismissed. The court of appeals, relying on case precedent, reversed the district court. On further review, we vacate the court of appeals and affirm the district court. We conclude the speedy indictment rule is properly interpreted to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. LiddellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Kersten Co., Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. EichlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Stuart v. PilgrimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Morgan HONOMICHL, Robin Honomichl, Timothy Honomichl, Deb Chance, Kara Chance, Karen Jo Frescoln, Mike Merrill, and Q.H., Appellee, v. VALLEY VIEW SWINE, LLC and JBS Live Pork, LLC, Appellants.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- State v. FrescolnCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
- Amended September 15, 2017 State of Iowa v. Erik Milton ChildsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Brandon Daniel Ruiz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025
- Brandon Daniel Ruiz v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.