Legal Opinion

State v. Liddell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 2003No. 02-1563PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

Keteris Liddell appeals his conviction and sentence for credit card fraud. Lid-dell alleges he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to challenge the validity of his jury trial waiver. Liddell also claims the district court failed to exercise its discretion when, during sentencing proceedings, the *808court remarked it had no choice other than to revoke his deferred judgment.

We hold Liddell’s trial counsel did not fail to perform an essential duty, and therefore reject his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Viewing its statements in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ComerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. GrandberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. State v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. State of Iowa v. Craig Anthony FinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. State v. NitcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API