Pringle v. City of Covina
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs Robert Pringle, operator of the Covina Cinema (hereafter Cinema), and Darlene Pritchard, a patron of the Cinema, appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction enjoining defendant City of Covina from “arresting or prosecuting or instituting civil actions” against the Cinema under its adult entertainment zoning ordinance.
The Cinema is a motion picture theatre in Covina. In 1977, the Cinema offered a repertory theatre program consisting of a variety of films, including an occasional showing of films containing sexually explicit matter which consequently…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Lucero)California Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Kuhns v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- City of Whittier v. Walnut Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Strand Property Corp. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.