Legal Opinion
Strand Property Corp. v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1983No. Civ. 28741PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLOGNE, J.
Strand Property Corporation, Jimmie Johnson, Charles Boeckman and Freddie Bantu were charged by a complaint with violating San Diego Municipal Code (Code) section 101.1810, which prohibits “the establishment ... or transfer of ownership or control of” an adult motion picture theater within 1,000 feet of a residential zone, a church, school, public park, social welfare institution, or another adult entertainment business.
An “adult motion picture theater” is defined by the Code as “[a]n establishment ... in which a substantial portion of the total presentation time is devoted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- George Basiardanes v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Keego Harbor Co. v. City of Keego HarborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of WhittierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- People v. Superior Court (Lucero)California Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Vallejo v. Adult BooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Guevara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Vallejo v. Adult BooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.